🎨 Elevate your ink game with wireless precision!
The JimKing 113E Wireless Tattoo Transfer Stencil Printer leverages advanced thermal technology to deliver ink-free, high-definition stencil prints with 300x300 dpi clarity. Featuring a powerful 2500mAh rechargeable battery, it supports up to 150 prints per charge, enabling uninterrupted workflow. Its Bluetooth connectivity and dedicated TOEC TATTOO app allow seamless printing from smartphones, tablets, and PCs. Lightweight and portable at just 1.26 pounds, this stencil printer is designed for tattoo artists seeking professional, efficient, and mess-free stencil transfers.
| Controller Type | Android |
| Printer Media Size Maximum | 8.27x11.69inch |
| Included Components | printer |
| Print media | Paper (plain) |
| Scanner Type | Portable |
| Max Input Sheet Capacity | 150 |
| Max Copy Speed (Black & White) | 15 ppm |
| Compatible Devices | Smartphones, PC, Tablets, Laptops |
| Maximum Color Print Resolution | 300 x 300 dpi |
| Sheet Size | 8.27x11.69 Inches |
| Warranty Type | Limited Warranty |
| Color Depth | 24 bpp |
| Dual-sided printing | Yes |
| Initial page print time | 4 seconds |
| Duplex | simplex |
| Hardware Interface | USB Type C |
| Ink Color | Black |
| Additional Printer functions | Print Only |
| Control Method | App |
| Processor Count | 1 |
| Series Number | 8018 |
| Total Ethernet Ports | 4 |
| Number of USB 2 Ports | 1 |
| Total USB Ports | 1 |
| Model Series | MP8018 |
| Specific Uses For Product | Tattoo |
| Number of Drivers | 2 |
| Manufacturer | JimKing |
| Item Weight | 1.26 pounds |
| Product Dimensions | 11.14 x 1.53 x 2.36 inches |
| Item model number | 113E |
| Batteries | 1 Lithium Polymer batteries required. (included) |
| Number of Items | 1 |
| Size | portable |
| Manufacturer Part Number | MP-8018 |
Q**Y
Wireless Tattoo Transfer
This printer works great bought this for my boyfriend he works in a tattoo shopso he able to bring to the shop and home being that its so portable doesn't take up any room its quick and easy to setup takes about six minute to print a page very good buy
E**A
Extremely Poor Performance
This wireless tattoo transfer printer is truly disappointing. The Bluetooth connection frequently drops, and the transfer quality is blurry and unusable. The materials are also overpriced. Definitely not worth the price.
C**N
Didn’t work
This product was very easy to use however the quality wasn’t very good. Portability was great but the performance just wasn’t very good the print quality was very poor no matter what setting it was on.
G**S
Good for the hobbyist
Decent quality, affordable, and easy enough to operate makes this perfect for the hobbyist or aspiring artist.
L**S
A Tattoo Must
The heart of tattooing is design. This stencil printer makes it easy to design on your phone, tablet, or computer, and print directly onto transfer paper. Meaning, no more tracing or freehand if you have a design ready to go. Makes it easier and faster to get a design on paper and transferred. Would highly recommend!
N**Z
Don’t buy
We got it. It doesn’t work. Try to return it and they refused to take it back.
B**S
excellent stencil printer for tats, non-permanent body art
My nephew has been using the JimKing 113E Wireless Tattoo Transfer Stencil Printer for a while now, and it's been a solid addition to his studio and tat business. Priced around $115, this compact and lightweight thermal printer is perfect for tattoo stencils and his experimental body art projects. The small form factor makes it easy to carry around, especially when he's moving from show to show.The imagery it produces is sharp and precise, which is crucial for detailed stencil work. It connects seamlessly via Bluetooth, making it convenient to use with both my smartphone and PC. While it's not the fastest printer at 15 ppm, it does the job better than what he needs. The $4 off coupon would have been nice to catch, but even without it, this printer is a good buy.An STG Synergies BTN Enterprises Review!
T**.
Disappointing Results
Had issues connecting this tattoo stencil printer, and the results weren't as good as I expected.
Trustpilot
2 weeks ago
1 day ago
