External WiFi Bluetooth Antenna 22DBI MIMO RP-SMA Male Aerial Antenna and RP-SMA RG174 Extension Cable 10FT for Wireless Router Network Devices PC Camera

LIKES:1. WIFI SIGNAL IS GREAT...*NOTE: Please refer to product description. Also, Wifi Signal can be POSITIVELY OR NEGATIVELY affected due to numerous things...Examples: Antenna Possitioning or location like throught a wall or not2. GREAT VALUE FOR MONEY3. SIMPLE AND EASY TO INSTALL4. GOOD QUALITY MATERIALDISLIKES:1. It would be nice if both of these Antenna Order Selections INCLUDED CABLING

I have installed a night owl wi-fi cameras, but 2 of them became in on- off signal and the reception was very low. When I put the kaunosta high gain antenna, Wao the signal stay firmly and high reception.

I was surprised to see this product for sale claiming "22dbi gain". To get that kind of gain in a Wi-Fi antenna you either need a parabolic dish or a really tall dipole. I have a claimed 24dbi Wi-Fi dipole antenna on the outside of my house as part of a 2000' link to my well, and it's 60" tall.I have a barely functional Wi-Fi link between my house and my workshop using 2 Cradlepoint MBR1400 routers set up as bridges. The workshop system has a 24dbi dish antenna through a 2-watt preamp/amplifier and is connected to one of the three antenna ports on the workshop MBR1400.But the Bridge at the house just has the three stock 5dbi antennas that come with the MBR1400.I thought that adding another 17dbi antenna gain on three antennas would make the link solid. So I bought 4 of these units (Sold in pairs) and installed three of them on my house MBR1400.Instead of improving the link, the link failed.Ultimately, I set up a controlled, 30', static test using a third MBR1400's "Site Survey" feature, so I could measure the actual signal level of the Wi-Fi signal from the home-to-workshop MBR1400.With the three standard 5dbi antennas mounted on the home-to-workshop MBR1400, the test MBR1400 received a signal level of around -35dbm. By adding a 2-watt pre/amplifier to one of the antennas, the signal strength went up to -25dbm, which is right as these are 10 dB amps.But when I installed the 3 Kaunosta 2.4 GHz 22dBi WiFi Antennas on the house-to-workshop MBR1400, the signal strength went, not up to -18dbm, but DOWN to -45, a loss of 10 dbm over the stock Cradlepoint antennas.Just to be sure, I set up tests using just one antenna, and tested all three of the Kaunosta. antennas in the house-to-workshop MBR1400s, but the relative test results were the same.In my 50 years of being in tech, I should have learned not to believe in magic, that a 16" dipole antenna could have a 22dbi gain, but I did not expect them to LOSE 10dbi gain over stock, which is why my link failed.My junk box just got fuller. These antennas might make good drumsticks, but they are worthless as Wi-Fi antennas.

So when I originally got these I was using two with my dual antenna Alfa Long range setup not realizing they didnt support the 5ghz band. They will work but you actually suffer range loss compared to smaller 5-9dbi dual band antennas. Also if your using this indoors your link quality will suffer, inside I get better signal with an Alfa 9dbi antenna and thats on a dedicated 2.4ghz setup. An unobstructed view is about the only use case these are good for. If your device is USB powered its probably going to suffer using one of these.

Used this antenna on my King Wifimax unit for our camper. It works so much better then the swift 3db one that came with the wifimax.It is mounted right next to the swift antenna so we can switch between the 2 antennas. When the camp site wifi is far from our camper we use this antenna but if we are close to the camps wifi signal we will use the Swift antenna. So it has been great have both option to choose from. It will even pick up 5g signals. However most of the sites we camp at are only 2.4g.

I have installed two Xmarto security camera systems that I purchased from Amazon. Both work well overall with the aid of a couple of accessory external antennas. However, I installed the second system at my M-I-L's house which is covered with aluminum siding. I simply could not keep one camera from "dropping out" due to a low signal. I tried a couple of different 7 dba accessory antennas but the camera signal remained weak (1 to 2 bars) and unstable. When I saw that this antenna was rated at 22 dbi I knew that it might do the trick. It did! The camera signal is now three bars and rock-solid.If you are having a weak signal issue I highly recommend this antenna.

This antenna is marketed as a 50 ohm 22dbi omni-directional antenna in the 2.4GHz band. As such, it should work with any device that expects a 50 ohm antenna in the 2.4GHz band. Replacing a 50 ohm 4dbi omni-directional antenna on my device with this one, I would expect a narrower radiation angle than the 4dbi antenna, but an increased signal strength within that angle; the net result being an increased reception range in-axis with less range off-axis.What I actually saw was a decrease in reception range in-axis and little to no change in radiation angle. Upon contacting the seller regarding what I was seeing and where I might find the datasheet for the antenna, I was informed "It may not be compatible with your device." and no datasheet was provided. Their only suggestion was to return the product.Antenna design is an exercise in pure physics; unless this antenna was measured at 22dbi in another universe where physical constants are different, I can't see this being a 22dbi antenna. Compared to a 1dbi omni-directional antenna, it does seem to do better, so I'd guess it's more like a 3dbi antenna (maybe), but I'm not inclined to go through the effort to characterize this antenna's radiation pattern to confirm that. I would suggest staying far away from this one and maybe only purchasing antennas where a datasheet is provided.

I used this antenna as a Bluetooth receiver antenna for a speaker project I've been working on. It extended the signal to around 250ft through a brick wall until I started losing signal. Very happy with the performance for my application. With any antenna, placement is important though.

Habe die Antennen bei 2,4 und 5 gHz ausprobiert und in beiden Fällen war das Signal schlechter als über die integrierte Antenne der Fritzbox. Die Verarbeitung scheint aber immerhin gut zu sein.

An meinem Asus Router sind alte Tuning Antennen ... Nur knapp 20 cm lang anstatt ein halben Meter. Und diese Leisten deutlich mehr als das hier gekaufte Produkt.... 22 dpi ist hier ein chinesisches Wunschdenken

Wollte die beiden Antennen eines tp link eap225 outdoor wechseln. Hatte mir mehr Sendeleistung versprochen, aber Pustekuchen.Die Original Antennen Übertreffen diesen Schrott um ein Vielfaches.

Bin hepi Reichweite verdoppeln

Bringt trotz richtiger Ausrichtung im Vergleich zur vorher montierten Antenne (6dBi) eine deutliche Verschlechterung der Signalstärke.